Agency Of Income
  • World News
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Politics

Agency Of Income

  • World News
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Politics
World News

Dozens of Democrats mutiny must-pass defense bill over GOP priorities

by admin September 10, 2025
September 10, 2025
Dozens of Democrats mutiny must-pass defense bill over GOP priorities

The House of Representatives passed its version of Congress’ annual defense bill on Wednesday evening, albeit along stunningly partisan lines.

For decades, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has seen support from a majority of Democrats and Republicans. That’s changed in recent years, however, and the trend appears to have continued with the fiscal year (FY) 2026 bill.

The legislation passed 231-196 after a lengthy series of votes, with 17 Democrats voting in favor and 192 against. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and other top Democrats opposed the bill.

Democratic lawmakers had spent hours beforehand railing against GOP-led amendments on mainly transgender issues, including several which were successfully voted into the bill.

Multiple amendments by Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., for instance, placing limits on spaces that transgender service academy cadets can access, passed along mostly partisan lines.

Another amendment by Rep. Jimmy Patronis, R-Fla., aimed at eliminating the preference for motor vehicles using electric or hybrid propulsion systems and related requirements of the Department of Defense, passed with mostly Republicans – although six Democrats joined in approving it as well.

Rep. Cory Mills, R-Fla., introduced an amendment aimed at preventing pride flags or other ideological banners being displayed on military installations, which also passed along nearly partisan lines.

Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, announced on Tuesday that he would vote against final passage of the bill if certain GOP-led amendments made it into the final piece.

Smith also ripped Republicans for not allowing House-wide votes on solely Democrat-led amendments in the bill, all of which were filtered out when the House Rules Committee was considering the legislation earlier this week.

‘There are a number of problematic amendments included in the rule that focus on divisive topics rather than strengthening our national security. Should these amendments be adopted, I will vote against final passage of the bill,’ Smith said in a statement.
 
‘For 65 years, the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act has been a testament to shared respect for the duty of Congress to provide for the common defense and to place the needs of America’s national security and national defense above politics. The rule undermines this long-standing tradition by failing to include meaningful amendments offered by Democrats to address critical issues.’

Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., earlier spoke out against the amendments targeting transgender issues as well.

‘Many people in this body have received gender-affirming care. Filler is gender-affirming care. Boob jobs is gender-affirming care. Botox is gender-affirming care,’ Jacobs said.

It prompted an angry response from Mace, ‘That is ridiculous! You are absolutely ridiculous.’

Four Republicans voted against the bill in addition to the dozens of Democrats, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., and Thomas Massie, R-Ky., longtime skeptics of foreign aid funding in the NDAA.

Democrats who voted in favor of the bill include Reps. Jared Golden, D-Maine, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., Don Davis, D-N.C., Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, and Vicente Gonzalez, D-Texas.

The NDAA is an annually passed bill that sets defense and national security policy goals for the U.S.

The Senate is expected to consider its own version of the bill as well, after which the two chambers must compromise and consider them again before they get to President Donald Trump’s desk for a signature.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Trump directed envoy to warn Qatar ahead of ‘unfortunate’ Israeli strike, White House says
next post
Charlie Kirk’s assassination latest case of conservatives being targeted for murder

Related Posts

SCOOP: House Freedom Caucus draws battle lines as...

June 2, 2025

MIKE DAVIS: Eric Tung is Trump’s pick to...

August 9, 2025

Russia says NATO threatens WWIII in latest deterrence...

July 18, 2025

Trump moves nuclear submarines weeks after praising sub’s...

August 1, 2025

US sanctions money laundering network aiding Iran as...

June 6, 2025

Trump caps week with bold military moves from...

September 6, 2025

FLASHBACK: Trump launched his first presidential campaign ten...

June 16, 2025

European diplomats urge Iran to continue US nuclear...

June 20, 2025

Schiff launches legal defense fund in response to...

August 19, 2025

AOC slams progressive critics for ‘lying’ about her...

July 21, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts!

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest News

    • Mike Johnson fires back at Hakeem Jeffries’ ‘desperate’ call for televised shutdown debate

    • Schumer’s shutdown scheme explained: Dems double down on Obamacare credits as standoff drags on

    • Schumer’s shutdown holds as Senate Dems block GOP bid to reopen government

    • Kennedy claims Democrats want millions for foreign LGBT projects, electric buses to end shutdown

    • Pope’s top diplomat blasts Israel’s Gaza offensive as ‘ongoing massacre,’ condemns Hamas attacks

    • Trump warns of ‘massive bloodshed’ if Hamas fails to agree to peace deal: ‘MOVE FAST’

    Categories

    • Business (163)
    • Politics (20)
    • Stocks (112)
    • World News (601)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: AgencyOfIncome.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 agencyofincome.com | All Rights Reserved