Agency Of Income
  • World News
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Politics

Agency Of Income

  • World News
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Politics
World News

Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

by admin September 8, 2025
September 8, 2025
Federal appeals court upholds $83.3M E. Jean Carroll judgment against Trump

President Donald Trump is still facing a $83.3 million payment to writer E. Jean Carroll after a federal appeals court rejected his challenge of a defamation verdict against him Monday.

The ruling from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds a lower court decision finding that Trump did, in fact, defame Carroll. Trump’s lawyers argued his comments about Carroll were protected by presidential immunity and that the verdict in the case was unjust. The three-judge panel rejected both of those claims.

‘We conclude that Trump has failed to identify any grounds that would warrant reconsidering our prior holding on presidential immunity. We also conclude that the district court did not err in any of the challenged rulings and that the jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable,’ the court opinion read.

‘The record in this case supports the district court’s determination that the ‘the degree of reprehensibility’ of Mr. Trump’s conduct was remarkably high, perhaps unprecedented,’ the court added.

Carroll sued Trump twice after she released a book in 2019, which claimed Trump raped her during a brief encounter with him in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.

Trump vigorously denied the claims, saying he had never met Carroll, that she was not his ‘type’ and that she fabricated the incident to sell books. His vocal and repeated criticisms and denials led to Carroll’s defamation allegations.

Monday’s ruling comes months after the same court rejected Trump’s appeal in another Carroll-related case. In that appeal, Trump challenged evidence that Carroll’s legal team introduced to the jury during the civil lawsuit, including the Access Hollywood tape that surfaced during Trump’s 2016 campaign.

The full panel of judges declined to hear Trump’s argument, however, forcing the president to either accept defeat or appeal to the Supreme Court.

Read the full ruling below (App users click here)

Fox News’ Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

previous post
Thune lays groundwork for nuclear option in Senate fight over Trump nominees
next post
LAPD ends Kamala Harris security after union backlash over elite officer use: report

Related Posts

Trump celebrates 6 months back in office: US...

July 20, 2025

Karine Jean-Pierre says Biden health talking points were...

September 12, 2025

Blinken claims Trump’s Gaza ceasefire deal drew from...

October 13, 2025

Chinese diplomat threatens to cut off new Japanese...

November 10, 2025

‘Genocide can’t be ignored’: GOP lawmaker backs Trump’s...

November 9, 2025

US used sonic weapon on Venezuelan troops, report...

January 11, 2026

DAVID MARCUS: In Harlem, excitement for Mamdani and...

November 2, 2025

SOUTHCOM commander abruptly retires amid escalating scrutiny of...

December 15, 2025

Republicans consider using reconciliation again after Trump’s biggest...

December 23, 2025

DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassified Trump-Russia docs: Here’s what...

July 26, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts!

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest News

    • Trump discusses whether he’d order a mission to capture Putin

    • Netanyahu and Rubio discuss US military intervention in Iran amid ongoing nationwide protests: report

    • Trump responds to post suggesting Rubio as president of Cuba: ‘Sounds good to me’

    • Federal judge blocks Trump administration from enforcing mail-in voting rules in executive order

    • US used sonic weapon on Venezuelan troops, report shared by Leavitt claims

    • GREGG JARRETT: If Walz is charged in Minnesota fraud scandal, his best defense is incompetence

    Categories

    • Business (193)
    • Politics (20)
    • Stocks (112)
    • World News (1,064)
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: AgencyOfIncome.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 agencyofincome.com | All Rights Reserved